NASM Forum > Using NASM

Reading Assembly from standard input

<< < (2/2)

Frank Kotler:
Nasm is Nasm.
If you prefer some other assembler. go for it.

Best,
Frank

Fl0wless:
No, no, that's not meant as criticism! Just purely out of interest.

Frank Kotler:
I really don't know. That's just the way it was done. I believe it does reprocess macros, yes.

Let me try a question for you... Why in the world would you want to produce a file the source for which has vanished forever?

Best,
Frank

Fl0wless:
Well, I could generate assembly, spawn Nasm as a subprocess, pipe the assembly in, and not worry about creating files / deleting files / worrying about old code fragments. Like I said, not really important, was just my initial approach.
Best regards,
Janis

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page